The PR in city branding is really starting to get exposure!
I have mentioned in an earlier post that my dissertation (the reason that I haven’t blogged for so long) topic is the contribution of PR to city branding. On my initial review of the literature back in February and March it was very hard to find sources that showed PR as anything more than a tactic in the support of marketing. In my most recent review of the literature not a lot has changed other than the ways in which I analyse and this is where my dissertation has really started to take shape.
Let me explain.
Having come from a marketing background I quite often didn’t get the big debate about whether PR was marketing, which was better or whether one was simply a spinoff of the other. I liked to think that as long as the companies that were utilising the tools were doing well what did it matter? Since completing the course however I do see a huge distinction between the two, but at the same time, without thinking one is better than the other. They both have their merits when used at the right time and for the right reason. This has meant that when looking at place and city branding I have been able to pick out tools, such as creating and managing perceptions and relationship building, as PR rather than accepting that they are marketing.
This part of the dissertation has been hugely revealing to me, not just in showing that there is a very real place for PR in city branding, but also in that I can see how much I have learnt over the last year about PR and also about not accepting everything I am told . It seems to me that if you push the boundaries a little it’s amazing what you can find.
Comments(4)